The support forum is built with (1) General and FAQ forums for common trading queries received from aspiring and experienced traders, and (2) forums for course video topics. How to Trade Price Action and How to Trade Forex Price Action videos are consolidated into common forums.
Brooks Trading Course social media communities
Brooks Trading Course Learning Resources >>>
In video 34A on slide 13 Al says that a reasonable minimal reward is always 2x actual risk. He also says that if the actual risk is too small a lot of traders will go for a reward that is 2x initial risk.
My question is: What is "too small" actual risk?
Is it less than 10% from entry to initial stop loss? Is it 20%? Or is it a fixed amount of ticks/ points, like the minimal scalp size?
It is not 10% from the entry, it's not 20%. It is more so a fixed amount of ticks than the percentage from the entry. The price quickly moves a few ticks before reversing movement a lot of the time. It's better to have a minimum risk of more than a few ticks. "Too small" actual risk to some traders is the risk such that the low of the candle is not reached before the stop-loss is reached. Different traders have different definitions. The best definition is the minimal scalp size, I think.
Too small actual risk is actual risk that is less than the average scalp size for the given day. Or actual risk that is a lot less than what you are risking.
For example, if your entry bar is 4 pts tall and your actual risk is 1 pt. Then that is too small, since 2x AR is 2pts, which is a lot less than your Initial Risk.